As a sort of opposite opinion, I would like to argue that the current 
convention of moving theorems out of mathboxes (move only if it's used by 
someone else) should also apply to metamath 100 results.

First of all, metamath 100 theorems are clearly not obscure facts that are 
hard to find, they are announced in the google group, showcased in the 
"recent news" on the metamath site and also permanently linked in the 
metamath 100 list. Now, if some metamath 100 theorem required the 
development of an important branch of math currently missing from set.mm 
(matrices or Fourier series, among recent examples), then it should be 
relatively easy for someone to make use of those theorems and fulfill the 
current movement criterion. Needless to say, another person might uncover 
some problem or inconvenience in the new math section, overlooked by the 
metamath 100 contributor.

In case new theorems are not being used, they can stay in the mathbox 
without any trouble, in my opinion. It gives the author more time to 
improve his results, and ultimately can't make them worse. I must agree 
that theorems in the main body of set.mm are more "well-known" than mathbox 
results, but I think that the "hype" around metamath 100 theorems is high 
enough to make people remember where to look if they want to prove 
something about matrices or Fourier series :-)

As a compromise suggestion, maybe instead of deliberately moving all 
metamath 100 results into the main body we shall leave it to the 
contributor of the corresponding theorem? I.e. allow them to move their 
metamath 100 entry into the main part when (or if) they want. And in case 
someone wants to see a metamath 100 theorem formalized by another person in 
the main part, they can always come up with some theorem using the metamath 
100 result in question to formally satisfy the movement "rule" :-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/936fa710-ca8b-4055-82f0-0b1fc228c178%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to