Since the iron was found with other fresh Katol stony pieces and some of the stony matrix is clearly visible on the outside of the iron, I see no reason to even consider cutting it to get a separate name. That is one nice thing of the iron being collected within a couple days of the fall, and well before any rains came along to oxidize and/or discolor the portion of matric on the iron. I think the few irons should be mentioned in the Official Katol classification, clearly they are 'pop-outs' from the Katol mass.

...just my 2 Rupees worth...

Best Regards,
Greg

====================
Greg Hupé
The Hupé Collection
[email protected]
www.NaturesVault.net (Online Catalog & Reference Site)
www.LunarRock.com (Online Planetary Meteorite Site)
NaturesVault (Facebook, Pinterest & eBay)
http://www.facebook.com/NaturesVault
http://pinterest.com/NaturesVault
IMCA 3163
====================
Click here for my current eBay auctions:
http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZnaturesvault



-----Original Message----- From: Michael Farmer
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 9:13 AM
To: Jim Wooddell
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] KATOL (L6) is official

I am not going to cut that piece.

Michael Farmer

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 2, 2014, at 7:03 AM, Jim Wooddell <[email protected]> wrote:

Then it should have it's own classification!  If it's 95% metal.
Just my opinion.

Do we classify falls or meteorites?

Seems we loose by classifying falls.

Jim

On 1/2/2014 6:24 AM, Michael Farmer wrote:
It was bought on the spot from the finders as they lined up to sell the meteorites. It is Katol:) Central India is not Morocco with every person having a box of meteorites to sell.
It is almost completely iron, with perhaps 5% silicates.

Michael Farmer

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 2, 2014, at 6:05 AM, Jim Wooddell <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Mike and all!

Can't tell by looking at it if it's all metal. If it is predominently metal (by a large %) and the olivines and such match that of Katol, then this would be an L-Metal....would it not?

Jim

On 1/1/2014 5:33 PM, Michael Farmer wrote:
Yes, this piece is oriented heat shield shaped with countless flow lines and bubbles on the thick backside crust. There are a couple of crystal-rich sections. It is one of my favorite pieces in my collection, the adventure to acquire was a little scary. Laurence Garvie has taken many photos of it, I am sure he has incredible photos I haven't seen. This photo was the only one I got. The piece is still at ASU on loan, it will be on display at the Tucson show.
Michael Farmer

Sent from my iPhone
--
Jim Wooddell
[email protected]
http://pages.suddenlink.net/chondrule/

______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6967 - Release Date: 01/01/14


--
Jim Wooddell
[email protected]
http://pages.suddenlink.net/chondrule/

______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to