Some comments that have been made suggest no chondrules, yet there they
are in the BSE images. Laurence does give their sizes in the write
up and they tend to be really small (200 - 700 um), but not really
uncommon. Because of their size, could that be why
some are missing them when they look at it and say no chondrules?
Jim
On 1/2/2014 9:10 AM, Carl Agee wrote:
Mike,
Given the wide range of lithologies we are hearing about, all I am
saying it might be interesting to test the multiple lithologies and
confirm what you are saying. I am not suggesting anything about
multiple bodies or not, I don't have an opinion. I am simply
describing how you could provide geochem evidence to form a well
supported hypothesis. By the way, Laurence's BSE's on FB are
unequivocal L6 -- nice equilibrated chondrules!
Carl
*************************************
Carl B. Agee
Director and Curator, Institute of Meteoritics
Professor, Earth and Planetary Sciences
MSC03 2050
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque NM 87131-1126
Tel: (505) 750-7172
Fax: (505) 277-3577
Email: a...@unm.edu
http://meteorite.unm.edu/people/carl_agee/
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6969 - Release Date: 01/02/14
--
Jim Wooddell
jim.woodd...@suddenlink.net
http://pages.suddenlink.net/chondrule/
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
