Re: [meteorite-list] Bush's Space Initiative

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:18:50 -0800

They found oil there?
 
Or do they have to place the Moon car there, before the VLT in Chile is ready?
 
Martin A.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 7:04 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Bush's Space Initiative

This is still NOT proven and in fact, there is evidence there is little or not water on the Moon. When they crashed Clementine into a shadowed crater thought to have water ice, none was seen in the debris.
 
The ISS is fragile and not really a great place to work. Microgravity is very difficult to work in. The Moon would be a much better place and much easier to work in and leave out from. Besides, we need to learn to work on the surface of another planet and the Moon would be a great place to do just that.
 
Christopher
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:45 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Bush's Space Initiative

Hi John, From what I understood from awhile back, the ice that is on the moons poles(?) would save them a lot of water hauling from earth. With the escape velocity so much less on the Moon, they would have an easier time launching a rocket full of water (for drinking and such) on the way to mars from there as opposed to the Earth.
Thanks, Tom
Peregrineflier <><
IMCA 6168
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:37 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Bush's Space Initiative

As there are quite a few space savvy folks on this list....just asking a question pertaining to Bush's speech.
 
He said the moon was the logical place to initiate space exploration missions.  Yet the moon has harsh environmental challenges.....and it seems those challenges are less on Mars.  Only the distance is a problem. 
 
It would seem to me that a space station orbiting Earth would be the better place to initiate trips to Mars and beyond?
 
John
 
 

Reply via email to