At least the fact that Carancas is a meteorite crater is resolved. I recall you refusing to accept that it was a crater. Michael Farmer
--- Adam Hupe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Sterling and List, > > This abstract clearly states that GRA 06128/9 oxygen > isotopes plot with the Brachinites: > > http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/2456.pdf > > This abstract actually has a nice plot clearly > showing > GRA 06128/9 plotting dead center with the > Brachinites: > > http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/1974.pdf > > I understand that the mineralogy is different from > Brachinites, but its parent body group been > identified > as far as I am concerned. > > NWA 3133 was instrumental in demonstrating that > finding groups for orphaned stones using oxygen > isotope plotting for parent-body provenance purposes > is feasible. This is the only reason why I can see > the > metachondrite issue coming up in the case of GRA > 06128/9 which seems to be more evolved. A neat > stone, > yes, but the outrageous claims that it is more > fantastic than other equally interesting meteorites > holds no water with me. Whatever is claimed for the > parent body for this stone also applies to > Brachinites. > > Just my thoughts, > > Best Regards, > > Adam > > ______________________________________________ > http://www.meteoritecentral.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > ______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list