RE: [mfg-smartcam] R levels

[Benz H. Babecki]

These are A950's from the late 80's through to about 2000. Very cool controls. Torque control has saved us many many cutter bodies. No special codes for cutter comp. The P and Q may still be able to be used like that, but don't use them.   [Benz H. Babecki]  -----Original Message----- From: Michael Senack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 7:38 AM To: Benz H. Babecki; JNB; Smartcam forum (E-mail) Subject: RE: [mfg-smartcam] R levels The good old Cincinnati’s from the late 70’s to early 80’s. The 7VT, 10VC, 10HC, CIMEX-3 and CIMEX-720 with their P’s and Q’s vector comps and their incremental Z depths. If my memory is right the older Cincinnati’s used G codes to turn comp on and off, left or right and on angles?   -----Original Message----- From: Benz H. Babecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 6:13 AM To: JNB; Smartcam forum (E-mail) Subject: RE: [mfg-smartcam] R levels   Jeff, There are a few machines that actually add a certain amount (usually specified in a parameter) to the "R" plane. Case in point our Cincinnati's the "R" plane is always programmed to the level of the top of the hole. The machine stays .100" away by default. The "Z" move is then always incremental from the "R" plane and assumed to be minus (it won't drill up away from the part like a Fanuc even if it is unsigned). Benz -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of JNB Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:49 PM To: SmartCAM User Group Subject: [mfg-smartcam] R levels Hello group,   Am I missing something? Why would you want to have an R level of 0.0 on any tool? This leaves no room for error when the operator decides to adjust the depth .050. Drill's don't like slamming into the part before the cut. I do programs with over 60 tools and many differant R levels and don't have a problem with it. Is this a new practice that I've not heard of in my 25 years of machining?   Jeff