On 2/1/06, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Chris Messina wrote: > > So what I think we can get out of the current discussion about plays > > and whatnot is a mapping to the chat context, where there area > > speakers and "lines". Given that, I think that using the DL approach > > makes more sense than ever. You're not dealing with P's... you're > > dealing with a speaker and they are defined by what they say -- eh eh, > > how's that one for ya? > > Using <dl> is still tag-abuse, IMO.
If that involves putting structure before semantics, perhaps it is tag abuse. I do see Chris' point though, but I would sincerely hope that nobody defined me by exactly what I say - it might make me look like a walking contradiction... oh, wait... um, never mind. _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
