On 2/2/06, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As I was saying... I don't think you can really extricate the process > from the results. Certainly the philosophy/process could be useful in > many contexts. Of course, I'd love to be wrong here. >
In theory, most spec processes are supposed to start with a review of existing specs and existing usage. In that sense, microformats is not different. What's different is that people here take it seriously. The people are the difference. That isn't to say being very clear in the docs isn't helpful. The microformats process is different in some ways, and it's worth making clear, but I think for most people experiencing is believing. -cks -- Christopher St. John http://artofsystems.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
