On 9/11/06, Ben Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11 Sep 2006, at 23:17, Stephanie Booth (bunny) wrote:
> Does this way of using hatom on comments make sense to you?
It does to me, yes. Although not using two separate hAtom feeds. I'd
just have one with the original post as the first entry in the feed
and comments following on sequentially. It's _a feed of the
discussion_, in my eyes.
Don't forget that hAtom isn't a "feed" per-se. It's semantic mark up
of elements of in HTML document to say they have a certain meaning.
Using this as a feed is a choice you may make (I don't think it's a
wise one) but that's an application of the data.
I'm not sure I understand the reason for wanting multiple feeds or
nested feeds to represent comments. I can't see the need for a
distinction between a comment and the original post at all.
Well, again that's a choice you can make but I'd say most people
clearly have a logical distinction between a post they've made and a
comment some random stranger has applied to that post.
Regards, etc...
David
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
