That's a good point -- and I think actually starting to look at what you can *do* with microformats and providing technology implementations, rather than just formats, would be an additional purpose for this new list.
Something like microformats-implementors? Chris On 10/10/06, Ben Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So that's the idea for discussion. It may be naive. My motivation is to > reach to the average designer and developer folk in a way that's > accessible to them. > Thoughts? A lot of the reasons you've raised might also apply to people who simply want to *implement* uf rather than get into the discussions about creating them in the first place. I wonder if one list could server that need as well as the newcomers? Just a thought. Ben -- --- <http://www.200ok.com.au/> --- The future has arrived; it's just not --- evenly distributed. - William Gibson _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
-- Chris Messina Citizen Provocateur & Open Source Ambassador-at-Large Work: http://citizenagency.com Blog: http://factoryjoe.com/blog Cell: 412 225-1051 Skype: factoryjoe This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
