On 10/10/06 4:54 PM, "Ben Buchanan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So that's the idea for discussion. It may be naive. My motivation is to >> reach to the average designer and developer folk in a way that's >> accessible to them. >> Thoughts? > > A lot of the reasons you've raised might also apply to people who > simply want to *implement* uf rather than get into the discussions > about creating them in the first place. I wonder if one list could > server that need as well as the newcomers? Just a thought. What about creating a new list for *new* microformats, and keep microformats-discuss for general discussion, helping newcomers and new implementers alike? Implementers that have actually published an implementation should add themselves to the "implementations" wiki page and *then* subscribe to the microformats-dev list. Thanks, Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
