In the spirit of simplest solution first, why not start with just *one* new list for new microformats?
I think "propose" is too limiting because there is a lot more involved in the development of new microformats than just proposals (in fact, the more important parts are *not* the proposal). I like the suggestions of opening up microformats-dev as well. Anybody else on the list have thoughts? Thanks, Tantek On 10/14/06 10:19 AM, "Chris Messina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be good to resolve this matter -- discuss should be probably > be retained... but I like > > microformats-propose > > and > > microformats-applied (instead of apply) > > Anyone else? Who has the authority to actually make this happen? ;) > > Chris > > On 10/14/06, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tantek Çelik >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >> >>> What about creating a new list for *new* microformats, and keep >>> microformats-discuss for general discussion, helping newcomers and new >>> implementers alike? >> >> Better to create two new lists, perhaps: >> >> microformats-propose >> and >> microformats-apply >> or >> microformats-use >> >> and then close this one, leaving its archives on-line. >> -- >> Andy Mabbett >> Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> >> >> Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> >> _______________________________________________ >> microformats-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
