In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>others have >said that they (think newbies would be) interested in authoring, not the >specification and I concur. I don't think anyone has said that. I certainly don't think people should be encouraged to begin authoring before first understanding what the are nad are not "allowed" to do (unless by "authoring" you mean "fill in a form and let a machine do the authoring for you") At the very least they should be given the option of reading the spec before they begin authoring - as is NOT the case with hCalendar, at present. >What if we use a convention that the entry page (i.e. >http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard) would be an index into a list of >(psuedo) standardized sub pages so that it would be very people to find what >is important to them. Reasonable, but it needs some content, so as not to appear dry and unwelcoming. > For example, is a list of potential sub pages: [...] >* Brainstorming (might be combined w/Discussion) Once they standard is set, the brainstorming (and related examples) is only of archival interest. I note that your list does not include an explanation of Semantic XHTML... -- Andy Mabbett Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
