The point is there isn't necessarily one for a new spec. Until someone builds one.
No worries here. I'm commited to doing this. See my todo list. Is there any that are missing?
So my point was I wouldn't see a generators/creators as the entry point for a microformat, that's all.
Ah, ok. Summary: * Support Scanning * Don't overwhelm with resources/text * Provide strong scents for where relevant information lives.
And sorry if I'm overstating that which everyone may already be agreeing on.
Building consensus and making sure we understand one another isn't a waste of time. But now that we all agree, let's please start taking notes and mentally sifting through everything. Do you think you can do a refinement of your categories on the to-do list? Can you also enumerate the categories of content generally available on the wiki? I'm thinking: * Advocacy of Best Practices ( Do we really want to do this? there are other places that do this) * FAQ ( Both general and specific to each format. how do we present this?) * Spec Materials (Landing page, getting started, guides, and spec.) Can we somehow fit all the content on the wiki into these areas? Would it address the concerns on the wiki-feedback page? Are there categories missing? Ben _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
