In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Mabbett ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >>>Added to the wiki: http://microformats.org/wiki/faq#Class_semantics >>> >>>Q. How will microformat class names impact page size? >> >>I added supplementary, and factual, answer, but it's been summarily and >>immediately reverted by Tantek. > >And falsely described by him, according to the IRC logs, as an >"unsubstantiated hypothetical and inaccurate answer". > >His tone is, once again, objectionable - or am I supposed to believe >that it's just "word play"? I restored my answer, together with evidence. Tantek has once again removed it, saying, on IRC, that it was: reverted due to suboptimal use of microformats - bad example which is odd, since when I first created that mark-up, I asked here, on this mailing list, for comments and was told that it was fine. Again, his tone is objectionable. I note that the discussion has now degenerated into a number of false accusations. Further to other comments, my example does use tables - but for tabular data, not layout. Since when were data tables deprecated? -- Andy Mabbett Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
