Andy said: > Having re-read the original "content rating" discussion, it's clear that > the initial proposal was for a uF for ratings of a current page, for > which tagging was, not unreasonably, suggested. > > The current proposal is for a method of "rating" (in a very loose sense) > the page which is being linked to, and for which tagging is not > appropriate. >
I haven't followed the entire thread but this seems like a good use case for xfolk or even hReview. The xfolk version could look like this: <div class="xfolkentry"> <a class="taggedlinked" href="http://goatse.cx";>check this out!</a> (<a rel="tag" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSFW";>NSFW</a>) </div> The hReview version would probably be similar, maybe just a wrapper around the xfolkentry to show that this is just one person's opinion and should be taken as such. Eran. _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
