In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian Suda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> Suppose Sue publishes a family tree as a series of web pages, one for >> each person. >> >> On her own page, she has: > >> http://example.com/sue.html >> Title: Sue Smith >> >> Jane Fred >> |_____________.______________| >> | >> Sue >> >> with an hCard for each person. If they tag Fred as "deceased", then >> they, too, are shown as deceased. Not good. > >--- i´m not sure how you came to that conclusion? On: <http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-tag#Abstract> By adding rel="tag" to a hyperlink, a page indicates that the destination of that hyperlink is an author-designated "tag" (or keyword/subject) for the current page. Note that a tag may just refer to a major portion of the current page > certainly >aggregators would mark that the page is "about" the term "deceased" >but it wouldn´t make an assumption about individual hCards? and >depending on the mark-up if Sue is NOT nested inside Fred´s hCard, >then there is a distinction between where/what/who the rel-tag is >relating. There is? Where, on the rel-tag spec, is that made clear? >We are dabbling in theoretical territory, Unlike some, I have no allergy to "theoretical territory". Indeed, it's a pre-requisite to science. >do you have a page that has >been marked-up somewhere and that page is being misinterpreted by >aggregators and parsers? if so please let us know so we can help >diagnose the problem. I am not planning on using rel-tag (especially not in hCard and hCalendar) until this and some of the other issues with it have been resolved. I suspect I'm not alone in that. I also can't lay an egg, but I can tell when one has gone off ;-) -- Andy Mabbett * Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> * Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> * Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ? _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss