On 03/01/07, Nick Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seeing the tag implementation on Operator has made me question the existing tagging standard. With wordpress you may get something like "?cat=13" for a tag or something that may not even be the intended tag at all. After doing some research on the wiki I see that the rel="tag" microformat is based off of existing defacto standards (implemented by sites such as del.icio.us and flickr). I still don't see why the standard extracts the tag from the last part of the URL instead of the information inside the anchor tag. When I see a tag and click on it, I expect the visible content, not what's appended to the end of a URL. Anyone care to shed some light on this for me? -Nick
I might be misunderstanding you, but I think you might be confusing categorisation with tagging (the latter being a method of adding additional context)? -- Frances Berriman http://fberriman.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
