In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ben Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>I don't see a clear reason why ?tag=blah couldn't be an acceptable >format. On reflection, it seems to me that that's an "unpaved cowpath". Unfortunately, Google search for "?tag=" finds many instances of "tag". I wonder if another search engine might be more specific, or if someone has a way to trawl for it in some Google-code [1] like way? [1] <http://code.google.com/webstats/index.html> -- Andy Mabbett <http://www.pigsonthewing.org.uk/uFsig/> _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
