On 2/2/07, Joe Andrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to be clear here. This is not about a witch hunt or empty rebellion. The leadership has NO external checks and balances. Even the most private non-profit organization in the united states (I can't speak for other jurisdictions), must hold to certain standards about their leadership, their decision making, and directing the actions of the group for the benefit of society. Microformats has none of that. It is, rather, a private club that hasn't done such a good job at transparency with its constituency.
I'm certainly sympathetic to the concerns of both sides here, but man, there's only so many hours in a day to read mailing lists. I really wish there was a -meta or -governance or -process [1] list where these discussions took place. Regards, etc... David [1] http://microformats.org/wiki/mailing-lists-proposals#microformats-process -- the paragraph describing this doesn't really seem to be what I'm talking about here though. -- David Janes Founder, BlogMatrix http://www.blogmatrix.com http://blogmatrix.blogmatrix.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
