On 2/2/07, David Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/2/07, Joe Andrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to be clear here. This is not about a witch hunt or empty
> rebellion. The leadership has NO external checks and balances. Even the
> most private non-profit organization in the united states (I can't speak
> for other jurisdictions), must hold to certain standards about their
> leadership, their decision making, and directing the actions of the
> group for the benefit of society. Microformats has none of that. It
> is, rather, a private club that hasn't done such a good job at
> transparency with its constituency.
I'm certainly sympathetic to the concerns of both sides here, but man,
there's only so many hours in a day to read mailing lists. I really
wish there was a -meta or -governance or -process [1] list where these
discussions took place.
Amen. I would be happy to subscribe to a -meta list and check it once
in a while, but having it mixed in with the actual work is exhausting.
-mike
--
Michael McCracken
UCSD CSE PhD Candidate
research: http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~mmccrack/
misc: http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
