Hi Joe,
On Feb 2, 2007, at 8:22 AM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
Third, although few people like a gadfly, it appears that my
efforts are
making some sort of difference, as evidenced by the IRC above and
changes to the wiki. Following Ben's argument, all evidence
suggests my
opposition is "working".
That said, I do take your criticisms to heart and will make an
effort to
be more diplomatic. I think there is an opportunity for uF to thrive.
It is instead alienating, based on feedback I've received, not only
from
Andy, and not only through this list. We can do better.
I do welcome your efforts to be a gadfly, and I welcome even more
your commitment to be more diplomatic. :-)
I also encourage people to post suggestions/votes/data on the
relevant wiki pages, to help push us towards a constructive solution:
* http://microformats.org/wiki/faq#Q:_Who_controls_microformats.3F
* http://microformats.org/wiki/issues#Governance_Issues
I would also like to revive the idea of a "meta-discuss" list to
handle governance and other non-technical issues. This appears to be
off-topic for the current wiki page on mailing lists for new
micorformats:
* http://microformats.org/wiki/mailing-lists-proposals#microformats-meta
So, can anyone suggest the appropriate venue for proposing/discussing
that?
-- Ernie P.
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
