In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> That's a point-of view, but not a definitive fact. Who says it's >>not a microformat? With what authority? > >Um, is there any authority you *would* accept for that usage? It doesn't matter what I do, or would, accept; it's what the wider public would accept which is at issue. >The "common usage" on this list is that "microformats" is best applied >that markup which follows the microformat process: > >> http://microformats.org/wiki/process > >and that other forms of semantic markup should be referred to as >"semantic HTML" or POSH. Indeed - but again, it's what happens *outside* this list which is at issue. -- Andy Mabbett * Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> * Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> * Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ? _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
