Tantek Çelik wrote:
On 5/3/07 7:10 PM, "Patrick H. Lauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But to bring it back to the original argument, the routine extraction
does not necessarily have to equate to data visible in, say, a
tooltip.
The routine extraction may well be mediated via some machine
interpretation.
"May" is insufficient in this case, as such machine mediated
interpretation
is a "theoretical" (or certainly not available to many people) and
thus
insufficient.
The "tooltip" is the only practical semi-visible method available
currently.
If you need to see the machine data for your own QA, you could write
a JavaScript bookmarklet to pull it out of a more appropriate place.
You're making the same case that it "may" be forgotten and therefore
get out of date.
If you have a deployed practical semi-visibility alternative to the
tooltip,
I'm very much interested to hear it.
I implemented neither, but Operator and Tails both do this already.
James
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
