People seem to be put off by words like semantic or microformat. Maybe
we need to do some more research outside of this mailing list?
Does anyone have any ideas how we could design some research to try and
answer this? Some scenarios we could user test would be the difference
between a page with MF and a page without for a user with an MF
supporting browser but no concept of MF. And a user without an MF
consumer coming across a page encouraging them to get one.
Ben Ward wrote:
On 28 Jun 2007, at 15:59, Thom Shannon wrote:
yes, it's a "thing", it's different. FF3 can't just add any address
you see to your address book, its a specific kind of address that
just looks the same, and you need a browser or plugin or something
that understands that specific "thing"
So whats the thing called, micro-what? or "Resuable Data" (with the
MF icon!)
I'm still not sure there's anything there that can't be served with
the term ‘rich web page’ or ‘semantic web page’ — two terms already in
use. What is the semantic way to mark up a business card? hCard.
If some reference to the page specifics is required in documentation
somehow, does ‘microformatted content’ or ‘microformatted web page’
not suffice?
Ben
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
