I was using that as an example. I was just reiterating Andy's point that
this is something different which needs to be identified, a user needs
to understand that the website has to support a standard that matches
what their software is looking for. Otherwise it doesn't work. This can
then help drive the uptake of MF since clients and managers will want to
know why they can't use their "add to address book" button on their own
site, this is where the name is important.
Rickards, Julian (NDM) wrote:
Off topic slightly: given that FF3 will (may?) have native support for
microformats, will Thunderbird?
-----Original Message-----
From: Thom Shannon
yes, it's a "thing", it's different. FF3 can't just add any address you
see to your address book, its a specific kind of address that just looks
the same, and you need a browser or plugin or something that understands
that specific "thing"
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
