Scott Reynen wrote: >> Not wanting to add to the confusion but would it not be possible to have >> infinitely nested haudios with neither item or track and use mfo when the >> markup enforces containment that you don't want to be reflected in the >> model? > > As much as I'd like to move forward a general MFO technique, that isn't > necessary here as the hAudio proposal specifically makes all contained > hAudio (currently called "track") opaque [1]. The current proposal > appears to only support two levels of nesting, but that may change. > Examples of several levels of audio published on the web today would > help support such a change.
We could also make the argument that there is no reason to restrict hAudio to two levels of nesting. There are no ill side-effects by not restricting it. -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
