On 15/10/07 15:51, "Scott Reynen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 15, 2007, at 7:28 AM, Michael Smethurst wrote:
>
>> Not wanting to add to the confusion but would it not be possible to
>> have
>> infinitely nested haudios with neither item or track and use mfo
>> when the
>> markup enforces containment that you don't want to be reflected in the
>> model?
>
> As much as I'd like to move forward a general MFO technique, that
> isn't necessary here as the hAudio proposal specifically makes all
> contained hAudio (currently called "track") opaque [1]. The current
> proposal appears to only support two levels of nesting, but that may
> change. Examples of several levels of audio published on the web
> today would help support such a change.
Multiple levels would also allow you to mark up multi-disc box sets:
Haudio - hex enduction hour
haudio - disc 1
haudio - The Classical
Sorry for lack of examples - I'm short on time today
>
> [1] http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-proposal#Track
>
> --
> Scott Reynen
> MakeDataMakeSense.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-new mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on
it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
