http://creativecommons.org/license/music

Their approach has the musical work(s) described on a page as the only
content on that page, so rel="license" makes a little more sense in
their use case. This would also make sense in the hAudio case, but has a
very high probability of abuse.

This only works when the primary topic of the page is a single work under the given licence, or a collection of works all under the same licence. If there are works under different licences, or if the hAudio is only a small part of a the page (as in my "Music in the Digital Age" essay example), then it fails.

The XHTML vocabulary also defines rel="license" as applying to the
current document and not to resources in the document.
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#license
Keep in mind that this is a non-issue in RDFa since you always have a
subject, which is why it is supported in Audio RDFa[2].

I'm referring more to pages written as non-RDFa hAudio which are then *parsed* as RDFa. Because then no explicit RDFa subject is likely to be given (using e.g. @typeof or @about), so any conforming RDFa implementation will take rel=license to apply to the entire page.

--
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>



_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
microformats-new@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new

Reply via email to