> I think that would bring a severe performance penalty; Midgard
> currently uses persistent connections to the respective databases,
> but we'd have to drop that if the actual database could change
> (theoretically) for each request.
>
I agree about the performance penalty, but if I put say 5 different DBs in
httpd.conf, are they still pconnected ?
We could imagine that each time midgard find a new DB definition, it opens a
persistant connection to that DB, as it will surely need it for future
requests for that host...
Of course, if you have 500 DBs... another problem comes up.
> Bye,
> Emile
>
bye
david
--
This is The Midgard Project's mailing list. For more information,
please visit the project's web site at http://www.midgard-project.org
To unsubscribe the list, send an empty email message to address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
