do non persistant db connections really make such a difference, and
especially, when?
Maarten
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "midgard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: [midgard] Suggestions for Midgard 2.0
> On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, David Guerizec wrote:
> >
> > > So I came to this conclusion: why the database isn't set into the host
> > > record ?
> >
> > In the database, you mean? How would Midgard know what database to
access
> > to look up what database it should access?
>
> To fast with the 'post' key. Here's the rest:
>
> > Or better: why wouldn't we have a single Midgard super-admin site
> > (stored in a meta-DB) ...
>
> I think that would bring a severe performance penalty; Midgard
> currently uses persistent connections to the respective databases,
> but we'd have to drop that if the actual database could change
> (theoretically) for each request.
>
> Bye,
> Emile
>
>
> --
> This is The Midgard Project's mailing list. For more information,
> please visit the project's web site at http://www.midgard-project.org
>
> To unsubscribe the list, send an empty email message to address
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
This is The Midgard Project's mailing list. For more information,
please visit the project's web site at http://www.midgard-project.org
To unsubscribe the list, send an empty email message to address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
