On 6 Mar, Paul Newby wrote:
> Yes, I can see that not listing articles with the 'up'
> field set might be useful under some conditions, but
> it seems that it would be more reasonable if all the
> articles were listed by default, with extra logic
> necessary to suppress the articles articles with
> nonzero reply fields.
I can see your point. However, I wouldn't be too
quick to change behavior on something like this
that has been in Midgard already for quite some
time and probably has many applications depending
on this.
But yes, a function for listing *all* articles
of a topic regardless of where the 'up' field
points to might still be useful. If you need
this, please go ahead and post it to the Keystone
system.
Another point, if you are using the up fields
only because you need more fields containing
indexable information, another possible choice
could be to use an extra field with multiple,
comma-separated values. That is what we've been
thinking of recently with a workflow application
we were requested to build for the HR dept at
work.
> Paul N.
/Bergie
--
-- Henri Bergius -- +358 40 525 1334 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
http://www.iki.fi/Henri.Bergius
--
This is The Midgard Project's mailing list. For more information,
please visit the project's web site at http://www.midgard-project.org
To unsubscribe the list, send an empty email message to address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
