>> For the comment system, I am wondering what the best way to integrate it into
>> the database is. Perhaps how the topics/articles are managed in Midgard as
>> separte tables, with links to each other. However, will this make it
>> difficult to cull old comments? Any suggestions?
>
>I'd use reply articles, or the article 'type' field.
Ahh.. okay. Thank you.
One follow-up to that: I recall seeing in an earlier message that some of the
Midgard functions which add to the database check to see if a valid user is
logged in. Can this be sidestepped? Can anonymous (or not logged in) users
add replies?
>> Oh, and one other thing... would it be worthwhile to just upgrade to
>> 1.4beta? The site isn't finished yet, and I'd hate to get it done just as 1.4
>> is released.
>
>Depends on your timeframe. 1.4 is slated for release in september. The
>betas have been reasonably stable. If you intend to use sitegroups, go
>with 1.4 and save yourself the hassle of migrating to sitegroups later.
Am I correct in my understanding that sitegroups are used when you have
several distict sites hosted on one machine? I don't have this. It's just
one site on one machine.
>Emile
--John Gruenenfelder Research Assistant, Steward Observatory, U of Arizona
--
This is The Midgard Project's mailing list. For more information,
please visit the project's web site at http://www.midgard-project.org
To unsubscribe the list, send an empty email message to address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
