On Nov 17, 2011, at 1:26 PM, "Keith Moore" <[email protected]> wrote: > It's not just that. A fundamental design choice of DNS is that there is only > one resolution context. Yes, it's not unusual for that design choice to be > violated. But that still doesn't make it right for MIF to violate it.
Do you mean only one namespace? It is not at all a fundamental assumption of the DNS that there is only one resolution context. That is an implementation artifact that actually must be fixed if we are going to come up with a good solution to the MIF problem statement. _______________________________________________ mif mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
