On Nov 17, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Nov 17, 2011, at 9:34 PM, "Keith Moore" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Right, so that's the uniform namespace assumption. But if you have two >>> routers querying two different sets of servers, this is a non-issue. >> >> Actually, that's not even true. And to the extent it is true, that is an >> implementation artifact. > > Wow, I don't know where my brain was just then. I meant "resolvers," not > "routers."
I just assumed you meant separate data paths, including all of resolvers, routers, network links, etc. Seriously, dual-facing servers are the implementation artifacts. It's an accident that they work at all. _______________________________________________ mif mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
