On Nov 17, 2011, at 12:34 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Nov 17, 2011, at 1:26 PM, "Keith Moore" <[email protected]> wrote: >> It's not just that. A fundamental design choice of DNS is that there is >> only one resolution context. Yes, it's not unusual for that design choice >> to be violated. But that still doesn't make it right for MIF to violate it. > > Do you mean only one namespace? It is not at all a fundamental assumption of > the DNS that there is only one resolution context.
Either I disagree, or we're talking about different things. But DNS cacheing assumes that the correct set of answers to a particular DNS query are the same independent of where the query came from. This isn't an implementation artifact, it's how DNS was designed to work. Keith _______________________________________________ mif mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
