On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Arifumi Matsumoto <arif...@nttv6.net>wrote:
> So, it does not recommend targeting this model of walled garden, > > but it looks recommending to standardize better co-existence method of > > open model and closed model. > > > The model that the current dhcp route option draft describes seems me > > > to fall into the matter of co-existence. > > I think you're reading the text wrong. I don't see the word coexistence anywhere in the text; the sentences you quote are all about "escaping" the walled garden. In fact, the text says: These focused on service location and escape from the "walled garden" - i.e., when you are in a walled garden, figure out how to access the Internet instead. So it seems to me that the IAB is saying: 1. Don't target the walled garden model with protocols and architectural decisions. 2. Investigate standard ways that make it easier to escape from the walled garden.
_______________________________________________ mif mailing list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
