> From the text I think their intention was to make it easy for users in walled gardens to access the Internet properly, not to make it easy to allow Internet users to access walled gardens properly.
I don't see the difference. 2012/11/6 Lorenzo Colitti <lore...@google.com> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Arifumi Matsumoto <arif...@nttv6.net>wrote: > >> The RFC says "integrate". So I understand the co-existence is recommended. > > > Yes, but as in "integrate the walled garden into the Internet", not the > other way around :) > > >> Service location and escape is focused in that RFC. I think delivering >> correct routing information for both internet connecting service, and >> walled garden >> service should be service location and escape mechanism. >> > > From the text I think their intention was to make it easy for users in > walled gardens to access the Internet properly, not to make it easy to > allow Internet users to access walled gardens properly. >
_______________________________________________ mif mailing list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
