On 06/11/2012 16:08, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Brian E Carpenter < > brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think it's a bit of a stretch to say that >> draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option explicitly targets this >> model; it's actually a generic mechanism, even if some of the >> use cases do fit the walled garden model. >> > > That was not the assertion made in this ticket. I believe that (part of) > the assertion was that use cases that target walled gardens should be > removed as justification, because IAB guidance is that protocol and > architecture development should not target walled gardens. > > If there are other use cases, then we should decide on the merits of those, > but the use cases that are targeting walled gardens should be removed. > > Does that make sense? Do you agree?
I agree, but I'm prejudiced because I was in the IAB at the relevant time ;-). Brian > _______________________________________________ mif mailing list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
