Hi Aliya,

Please refer to the following comments:

1. Purpose of Loan - It was very interesting to notice that the same points
are repeated under both the categories namely, "Configurable only at
installation" and "Configurable from UI at all times". The exception among
all these points is the "Purpose of Loan" which appears only under the
category "Configurable only at installation". Thus, I still  feel that the
UI is consistent with the specs and not a bug.
Do let me know your take on this.

2. Ability to Repay Loan on Non-Meeting days - I went through the link and
found that the feature is functioning according to the specs. The system
allows to make a payment dated earlier but not before the last MEETING
date.
Do you intend to explore the option to allow past dated payment even before
the last meeting date (but after the date of disbursement) to leave a scope
to rectify mistakes/ommissions?

3. Ability to Disburse Loan on Non-Meeting Days - I can see now that its
not a bug. Probably in case of mistakes/ommissions, permission to make past
dated disbursements under this feature would be helpful. So, now the user
will have two options to disburse loan in the past, i.e, under this feature
and under "Redo Loans". I would really like to hear more about this from
you.




Thanks & Best Regards,
Arpita Adhicary
Business Analyst
IBM India Pvt. Ltd.
2nd Floor, Block A
Embassy Golf Links
Off Indiranagar-Koramangala Ring Road
Bangalore - 560 071
Mobile: +91-9886754331

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


                                                                           
             "Aliya Walji"                                                 
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                             
             undation.org>                                              To 
                                       Arpita Adhicary/India/[EMAIL PROTECTED], 
   
             21/12/2007 06:43          "Emily Tucker"                      
                                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,    
                                       "Beth Mazur"                        
                                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,     
                                       "Sam Birney"                        
                                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>     
                                                                        cc 
                                       "Mifos functional discussions"      
                                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
                                       .net>                               
                                                                   Subject 
                                       RE: Functional Issues               
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




Hi Arpita,

Some more comments are inline below.  Let me know your thoughts :)

> 1. Purpose of Loan - Thanks for the link. It says that some of the
fields
> can be made optional/mandatory only during installation, and "Purpose
of
> Loan" is one of them. Therefore, the option to make it
mandatory/hidden is
> not there in UI and it suits the given specs.
> Thus, its not a bug.

Oh, excellent comment.  I might be mistaken, but all of the other fields
that are listed on the list on the configuration options page as being
able to be made optional/mandatory are all configurable in the UI in the
"Define mandatory/hidden fields" feature.  I know the note on the FS
says that they are only to be specified at installation time, but that
goes for all of the fields in the list, not just the "Loan Purpose"
field - so this is an inconsistency that it is not included in the list
in the UI.  So, I still think it's a bug.  Am I still mistaken or do you
agree?  If you agree, can you open the item in the issue tracker?

> My questions: i) Should the loan officer be allowed to make a past
dated
> "payment entry"? (That is, say if on Friday the loan officer wants to
make
> an entry for payment made on Wednesday, should he be allowed?)  At
present
> the system allows this and I think it should allow so that a Loan
officer
> can rectify any mistake/ommission. Moreover, the feature "Redo Loans"
is
> available only to rectify wrong disbursals not repayments.

Ah, yes.  Now I see what you mean.  Mifos has a feature that allows the
user to configure whether back-dated payments are allowed.  So, if this
configuration is turned on, the user can enter transactions dated
earlier than current date (but later last meeting date).  See 'back
dated transactions' on this page for more detail -
http://mifos.org/knowledge/functional-specs/configuration-options#3_4_Mi
scellaneous

One thing we will have to investigate is how Mifos handles this with the
new feature that allows payments on non-meeting days.  Does the system
allow the user to enter transactions dated earlier than the current date
but no earlier than the last meeting date, or does the system allow the
user to enter transactions dated earlier than the current date but no
earlier than the last repayment date.  We didn't specify this explicitly
in the design of the "Loan schedule independent of meeting schedule"
feature so we should understand how it works and if it needs to be
modified.

> ii) The system doesn't allow to enter a date of repayment in the past
> which
> precedes the last meeting date. (That is, say a payment was made on
the
> first thursday of a month instead of monday. The officer forgets to
make
> the entry. On the third week, he realises his mistake and wants to
make an
> entry for the said payment. But the system will throw up a message
"entry
> prior to the last meeting date not allowed". Thus, the Loan officer
can
> make a past dated entry  but only till the last meeting date (in this
case
> only till second Monday of the month). So, I wanted to know whether
this
> kind of function is intended or is it a bug??

This is intended for now.  I think it was an explicit decision to only
allow back dated payments up until the prior meeting and not allow
back-dated transactions prior to that.  We can talk through some of the
reasons around that on skype/IRC if you are interested in hearing more
details about that.  So, it's not a bug but an area we could potentially
consider enhancing in the future if the need arises.

Thanks,

Aliya





-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Mifos-functional mailing list
Mifos-functional@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-functional

Reply via email to