Yep.. that is exactly what is to be expected.. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom http://www.snappytelecom.net
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > From: "Ben Matson via Mikrotik-users" <mikrotik-users@wispa.org> > To: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>, "Mikrotik Users" > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>, "Jeremy Austin" <jhaus...@gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 7:07:15 PM > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR routers and BGP > It’s probably a good idea to share my own experiences here. > From what I’ve seen if you have only one or two upstream peers with full > routing > tables the CCR series gear will be very dependable. When you start adding > complexity- say you get access to a peering exchange- you’re really going to > start to suffer. The issue is that the BGP process appears to be > single-threaded, meaning that no matter how many core you have on your router > you’re still only using that one core. I have a pair of CCR-1072s that I was > trying to peer pretty aggressively but ended up having to back off due to > stability issues. > From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org > [mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] > On Behalf Of Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 3:09 PM > To: Jeremy Austin <jhaus...@gmail.com> > Cc: Mikrotik Users <mikrotik-users@wispa.org> > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR routers and BGP > Well it's painful on my x86 machine, but I've never really been a problem. > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Jeremy Austin < jhaus...@gmail.com > wrote: >> RAM is a consideration. >> It's convergence time primarily, and route table maintenance, that will be >> considerably more rapid on x86 due to BGP being a single core process. >> I have heard of people happily running two full tables on CCR1016. I would >> be OK >> with this as long it were one of a pair of edge routers, as secondary, the >> primary being either x86 or bigger iron, depending on bandwidth requirements. >> YMMV. It's fairly easy to determine what your baseline CPU level would be if >> you >> do a full table peering internally for testing. I see about 40% under profile >> on a CCR1009 with a single full table. (Adds and removes being fairly slow… >> try >> searching the route table for a single route via the CLI, and you'll see how >> painful this is!) >> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > >> wrote: >>> Is your preference due to stability or speed of peer turn up? I guess I >>> should >>> have specified - I'm running full tables (two peers). >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Jeremy Austin < jhaus...@gmail.com > wrote: >>>> If you're running multiple full tables, Mikrotik on x86 will have better >>>> performance, typically, than on a CCR. I have run full tables on as small >>>> as a >>>> CCR1009 with few issues, but prefer x86. >>>> For a few thousand routes, as in an IGP, BGP on CCR is completely fine. >>>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users < >>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org > wrote: >>>>> I remember the CCR had a lot of issues running BGP and would crash. I'm >>>>> not >>>>> worried about it takes a couple of minutes to build routes when it first >>>>> boots >>>>> up. Are the issues resolved at this point? >>>>> I'm running an older x86 box for BGP and want to replace the Powercode >>>>> BMU (x86) >>>>> with a more power efficient unit, possibly a second CCR? Does this sound >>>>> like a >>>>> good idea at this point or will I have Mikrotik problems? Is there >>>>> something >>>>> better than the CCR for these jobs? >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>>> -- >>>> Jeremy Austin >>>> jhaus...@gmail.com >>>> (907) 895-2311 office >>>> (907) 803-5422 cell >>>> Heritage NetWorks - Whitestone Power & Communications - Vertical >>>> Broadband, LLC >> -- >> Jeremy Austin >> jhaus...@gmail.com >> (907) 895-2311 office >> (907) 803-5422 cell >> Heritage NetWorks - Whitestone Power & Communications - Vertical Broadband, >> LLC > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
_______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list Mikrotik-users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
