I am not seeing the same results i do on occasions see an individual cpu spike 
like what your showing in your pic but it happens on all 8 cpus at different 
times.  For the most part it stays below 30%.

Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct
866-680-8433 Toll Free
http://www.video-direct.tv

> On Nov 9, 2017, at 10:00 PM, Mike Francis <mfran...@jmfsolutions.net> wrote:
> 
> Totally agree with Faisal... Every CCR I have ever seen doing BGP looks just 
> like the attached screenshot. Interestingly a similar config and number of 
> peers on a CHR has very different results.. Maybe it is something that vmware 
> or intel is doing? See both snips.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> John Michael Francis II
> JMF Solutions, Inc
> Wavefly - Internet | Voip | Cloud
> INC 5000 #2593
> CRN Fast Growth #105
> 251-517-5069
> http://jmfsolutions.net
> http://wavefly.com
> 
> "People are unreasonable, illogical, and self-centered. Love them anyway. If 
> you do good, people may accuse you of selfish motives. Do good anyway. If you 
> are successful, you may win false friends and true enemies. Succeed anyway. 
> The good you do today may be forgotten tomorrow. Do good anyway. Honesty and 
> transparency make you vulnerable. Be honest and transparent anyway. What you 
> spend years building may be destroyed overnight. Build anyway. People who 
> really want help may attack you if you help them. Help them anyway. Give the 
> world the best you have and you may get hurt. Give the world your best 
> anyway." By: Mother Teresa
>> On 11/9/2017 9:45 PM, Faisal Imtiaz via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>> #1) Not sure which CPU core you are looking at when you say CPU is less then 
>> 20%
>> 
>> Look deeper, and you will see the each cpu core utilization.. aggregate view 
>> is mis-guiding
>> 
>> #2)  As I shared before, using default routes in conjunction with full 
>> tables, with any traffic engineering (as padding does not count), you can 
>> very well have traffic that will make it to where it is supposed to go, one 
>> way or another.
>> 
>> However when you start traffic engineering, i.e. selecting both incoming and 
>> outgoing paths across particular carriers, and you have traffic destined for 
>> particular places in the world..... you can see your changes or any other 
>> changes taking 10-15min to become active... as opposed to 1-3min...
>> 
>> Now put a bunch of them in the mix (lots of peers) and you now have a Route 
>> Table which is out of sync....
>> and if you are providing them to others.. you have interesting and strange 
>> behavior...
>> 
>> Regards.
>> 
>> 
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> http://www.snappytelecom.net
>> 
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>> 
>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Shawn C. Peppers" <videodirectwispal...@gmail.com>
>>> To: "Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
>>> Cc: "Mikrotik Users" <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>, "Josh Luthman" 
>>> <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 10:35:42 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR routers and BGP
>>> Just check router and its passing a gig, has firewall configured, and 
>>> hasn't hit
>>> over 20% CPU.  ccr1009-8g
>>> 
>>> Router has been up for 377days, not a hiccup even heard.
>>> 
>>> Not sure what kind of hidden issue your speaking of but this setup works 
>>> fine
>>> for under a 1 gigbit networks, i have it configured for multiple isps and 
>>> never
>>> hear or see any complaints.
>>> 
>>> Shawn C. Peppers
>>> Video Direct
>>> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
>>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 9, 2017, at 9:00 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> LOL !...
>>>> 
>>>> Believe me your router is having issues (aka struggling in keeping up with 
>>>> the
>>>> full tables and updates).
>>>> 
>>>> You just might not be aware of it or have been affected by them to notice.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes it is possible to have a network, where one is happy and unaware of 
>>>> mundane
>>>> / yet intricate BGP issues..
>>>> Consider yourself fortunate.. but at the same time do not use this as a
>>>> 'standard' of measure that all networks are just like yours :)
>>>> 
>>>> I am not trying to be condescending, but offering a technical perspective 
>>>> for
>>>> you and anyone else who wants to reconcile the two sets of commentary that
>>>> happens every time the question of CCR and BGP is asked !
>>>> 
>>>> :)
>>>> 
>>>> Regards.
>>>> 
>>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>>> http://www.snappytelecom.net
>>>> 
>>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>>> 
>>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>>> 
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Shawn C. Peppers via Mikrotik-users" <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
>>>>> To: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>, "Mikrotik Users"
>>>>> <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 7:24:33 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR routers and BGP
>>>>> I am running a CCR with two peers, full ipv4 and ipv6 routes, large ospf, 
>>>>> qos,
>>>>> and pppoe customer and seeing zero issues.  Actually it is probably my 
>>>>> most
>>>>> reliable router.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Shawn C. Peppers
>>>>> Video Direct
>>>>> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
>>>>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2017, at 4:54 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users
>>>>>> <mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I remember the CCR had a lot of issues running BGP and would crash.  I'm 
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> worried about it takes a couple of minutes to build routes when it first 
>>>>>> boots
>>>>>> up.  Are the issues resolved at this point?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm running an older x86 box for BGP and want to replace the Powercode 
>>>>>> BMU (x86)
>>>>>> with a more power efficient unit, possibly a second CCR?  Does this 
>>>>>> sound like
>>>>>> a good idea at this point or will I have Mikrotik problems?  Is there 
>>>>>> something
>>>>>> better than the CCR for these jobs?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>>>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> 
> <CHR-BGP-Capture.PNG>
> <CCR-BGP-Capture.PNG>
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Reply via email to