I looked through this thread but did not see where anyone suggested adding or making sure you had the default forward rules in place.
/ip firewall filter add chain=forward connection-state=established comment="allow established connections" add chain=forward connection-state=related comment="allow related connections" add chain=forward connection-state=invalid action=drop comment="drop invalid connections" -Louis On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I have confidence in the routers themselves as everything from the > routers testing back to anywhere else work as expected. It's the inside > (NAT'd side of things that is giving us fits). > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Lambert > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 6:39 PM > To: Mikrotik discussions > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Throughput Problem on Mikrotik RB951 > > I use a RB951Ui-2HnD wirelessly at my house. It is in my basement, connected > via 100Mbps ethernet to the CCR1036 at the base of my tower which then > crosses an AirFiber 24 link to the office. I can move as many bits per > second as the wireless between my 4 year-old MacBook Pro and the 951 can > handle. My downloads are usually between 10 and > 30 M bits per second. It tends to depend on the site from which I am > downloading. > > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:47:31PM +0000, Justin Marshall wrote: >> Having an issue with a few customers behind RB951 Mikrotiks. All of >> these customers are on bridged Canopy 100's. >> >> Running a test from the Mikrotik (tools/bandwidth test) to a Mikrotik >> we have setup at our office I'm seeing 8-10.2Mbps down. However when >> the customer runs a speedtest (regardless of which speedtest server) >> they usually max out around 3Mbps down. >> > > I presume you run the MikroTik test, the customer runs the speedtest, you run > the MikroTik test, ..., in rapid succession and the results follow the device > all the time? > > Usually max out around 3Mbps? Do they *ever* max out above 3Mbps? > > What are the exact options you are using to test with from the mikrotik? > Have you tested with TCP as well as UDP and gotten the same speeds? > > Put this on the PC and test with it: > > http://www.mikrotik.com/download/btest.exe > > It is not working under Wine on my Mac at the moment. I've not actually used > it before. It seems to be less feature rich than the RouterOS built-in test. > Winbox works like a treat under Wine. > > Using it should allow you to determine if the test methodology is making a > difference in speed or if it is the device which is running the speed test, > if it actually works. Also you can test between the PC and the on-site 951 > as a control. > > Do large file downloads get the same rates as the speedtests? > >> One customer in particular was really helpful on trying to narrow down >> what could be causing this. He tried 3 different computers (both >> wired and wireless), 2 different cables between the computers and the >> RB951, and different ports on the RB951. He also gave me teamviewer >> access to one of these (wired to the RB951) to try a few different >> things. >> >> >> So far I tried: >> >> Upgraded to 6.15 firmware, did the /system routerboard upgrade. >> >> I've removed all traffic shaping rules that could possibly be >> effecting their speed. >> >> Tried using a src-nat rule in lieu of masquerade. >> >> Also tried 2 different browsers to make sure it wasn't just a browser >> issue on the computer I had teamviewer access to. >> >> Has anyone else experienced this, or have any other suggestions to >> try? > > Where do you rate limit your customers, if you do? > > What do you use to rate limit your customers? > > If you hook a laptop directly behind the bridged Canopy 100, with the same IP > as the 951 had, what speed does the laptop get? > > We don't have much Canopy gear; and I don't admin it. Ours is ancient, > 900MHz, and only does 3Mbps down / 1Mbps up total. I presume yours is > actually able to move the 10Mbps down. > > Are you tracking the throughput of your Canopy APs so that you know they have > the headroom available while testing? Can you watch the, 1-3 second average, > throughput on the SM and AP while the tests are running? > And make sure there is no traffic to the tested SM before you run the tests? > > What does a /tool traceroute 64.250.34.225 look like? In RouterOS 6.recent > you should be able to let it run for about 90 - 120 seconds to get a good > sampling. > > Download WinMTR on the PC and run it for a similar period. > > Show us the results from both if nothing jumps out at you. Copy and paste > the text, don't give us screenshots. I am not firing up a GUI mail > client.... I'm a grumpy old fart. :-) > > The MTR results may indicate where, if anywhere, there is a bottleneck or > packet loss. > > Re-run WinMTR and do a speedtest at the same time. We'll expect it to look > worse. The extra stress on the links may make bottlenecks and packet loss > more obvious. > > -- > Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS > > > -- -Louis NTInet O: 803-533-1660 X 207 C: 803-997-0004 _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list [email protected] http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
