Matt Cramer said: > The SA RBL checks make quite a difference to the amount of spam I catch, > so I wrote some code in my filter to perform the checks, score them the > same as SA would (given both Bayes and networking enabled), and then > modify the SA $report to reflect the tests. I suppose a better way than > what I do below would be to read /usr/share/spamassassin/20_dnsrbl.cf and > 50_scores.cf on the fly, but this stuff hasn't seemed to change too > frequently with the last few SA releases. > How is different then just using sa to score it and then reject based on spam score? I'm not understanding the signifigant difference between these two methods. -- Luke Computer Science System Administrator Security Administrator,College of Engineering Montana State University-Bozeman,Montana
_______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
