----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Cramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 7:13 AM Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] implementing spamass RBL checks in MD
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Lucas Albers wrote: > > > Matt Cramer said: > > > The SA RBL checks make quite a difference to the amount of spam I catch, > > > so I wrote some code in my filter to perform the checks, [...] > > > > How is different then just using sa to score it and then reject based on > > spam score? > > I'm not understanding the signifigant difference between these two methods. > > OK, maybe I am an idiot, but I thought MIMEDefang, when it called SA, > didn't do any of the network tests. Am I wrong? See also the FAQ entry at http://www.mimedefang.org/node.php?id=15 By default, MIMEDefang disables the SpamAssassin network tests: - RBL checks - Razor - DCC - Pyzor Look in your filter for $SALocalTestsOnly. The default value is 1. Change it to 0, and SpamAssassin will check the RBL's for you. By properly configuring SpamAssassin, you can also check Razor/DCC/Pyzor (all of these require additional programs/modules that aren't part of SpamAssassin). Chris Myers Networks By Design _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
