On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Lucas Albers wrote: > Matt Cramer said: > > The SA RBL checks make quite a difference to the amount of spam I catch, > > so I wrote some code in my filter to perform the checks, score them the > > same as SA would (given both Bayes and networking enabled), and then > > modify the SA $report to reflect the tests. I suppose a better way than > > what I do below would be to read /usr/share/spamassassin/20_dnsrbl.cf and > > 50_scores.cf on the fly, but this stuff hasn't seemed to change too > > frequently with the last few SA releases. > > > How is different then just using sa to score it and then reject based on > spam score? > I'm not understanding the signifigant difference between these two methods.
OK, maybe I am an idiot, but I thought MIMEDefang, when it called SA, didn't do any of the network tests. Am I wrong? Matt -- Matthew S. Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Office: 717-396-5032 Infrastructure Security Analyst Fax: 717-396-5590 Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Cell: 717-917-7099 _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
