> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jon R. Kibler > > So, this brings up a few questions: > 1) What is AMaViSD-new doing that MD isn't. (We abandoned > AMaViSD a couple of years back and > I really don't want to even have to consider that as an > option to solve this problem!)
AFAIK AMAVISD extracts and decodes the email, splitting it into it's separate parts, so that you end up with a sub-directory with all the various parts of the email, decoded, in it. The theory being that you only have to do that once, rather than each virus scanner doing it. I also am in the process of replacing my AMAVIS installs with MD, though this does make me think that, for the time being, I may not want to actually finish that process. I think I'll leave an AMAVIS install in the loop for the time being :( > I guess the bottom line issue is why does running ClamAV > under AMaViSD-new catch things that MD > does not, and should this be considered a MD problem, a > ClamAV problem, or both? Personally, I'd say it's a bit of both. Partly it's a bad case of blinkers on behalf of the ClamAV team. However it would be nice if MD didn't make any assumptions about the capability of any virus scanner and did the same as AMAVIS does - extract and decode the email so that the virus scanner software has as little to do as possible. -- Rob _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
