On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Chris Gauch wrote: > I also ran the test last night -- the only one that got through our server > is #24,
24 can be zapped by bouncing the "message/partial" MIME type. That's something I strongly recommend anyway; message/partial is a security nightmare. What the h*ll were the RFC authors thinking anyway??? :-( Regards, David. _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
