On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, David F. Skoll wrote:I use it, but mostly because it was recommended as the fastest initial line of defence against Viri when using MIMEDefang. The only times I have had false positives that I am aware of were bought to my attention by users. In both these cases, I was completely ignored by the File::Scan author when I contacted him via email with a sample of the offending code.I haven't reviewed any of the hits it gets, but I do use, and over the pastDoes anyone use File::Scan with MIMEDefang? It seems to cause a lot of problems with false positives.
year or two I haven't gotten any complaints about it.
David, if you say File::Scan is dubious, then I would stop using it if mimedefang stopped enabling it by default.
Roland
_______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
