Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 10:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> This depends entirely on your local mail topology. If MIMEDefang is >> running on your MX hosts, there is a real social cost associated with >> stream-by-recipient. > > But this is the nearly the same cost that you would be pushing to > the sending relay if you choose not to accept at the MX receiver.
s/pushing to/refusing to accept from/ (philosophical point) >> If MIMEDefang is running on an internal SMTP hub, then you've >> already accepted the mail anyway at your perimeter servers, and >> that cost goes away. > > In that case the cost is already yours - as perhaps it should be > if you are the one deciding not to accept but that the sender > should be notified. yup -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
